Wrapped
Jennifer Bradbury
Genre: YA, Historical Fiction, Mystery
Rating: 3
Description from Goodreads:
Jennifer Bradbury
Genre: YA, Historical Fiction, Mystery
Rating: 3
Description from Goodreads:
"Agnes Wilkins has
attracted the attention of one of 19th-century England's most eligible
men. When Agnes unwittingly pockets an Egyptian artifact during a mummy
unwrapping party, her action sets off a chain of events that bring out
dangerous characters--and true love."
2.5
stars, really. I wavered between 2 and 3 stars and I thought, if I were
a teacher I'd probably give this a low C, and if 5 stars is A, 4 is B,
etc, then 3 is fine. The main issue, for me, was the deceptive
description. It was so vague, that what I thought was going to be a book
about Egyptology and mummies and such turned out to be a book on
Napoleon and espionage and British patriotism. And it wasn't what I
wanted.
The first half of the book felt bland. I didn't care
about anything. The lackluster opening scene didn't help at all, she
certainly could have chosen anything more gripping
than trying on a dress with your mom. And the following chapter which
describes the mummy unwrapping party, I felt like I didn't get to hear
about the mummy at all and it was mostly about English party etiquette.
There was no description where I wanted it to be. And then we launch
into our espionage story and I was like oh. But wait, Egypt?
When we do get back to Egyptology, which is like
halfway through the book, it's only on an elementary level, and any kid
who had an Egyptology fetish when they were 8 will have already heard
this stuff. "This hook takes the brain through the nose." "The scarab is
a dung beetle." Blah blah blah. I dunno I was just like what is
happening and why is it so basic?
The strangest thing to me was just the oddball habit
that the author chose for her character. It's really awkward when the
author thinks the character is being cute and you're like "what?" So the
character is obsessed with languages, which is fine I guess since it
has a bit to do with the story and its ending. However, the character is
also obsessed with Jane Austen (which is done to death, but okay.) And
she has a weird habit of quoting barely relevant quotes of Jane Austen
in different languages at people when she's upset. Oh okay what now?
That's uh...pretty strange there. It would have been much 'cuter' if,
say, she slipped accidentally into a different language when getting
upset, instead of like Jane Austen quotes layered on top of that? It
just felt weird and forced and completely inhuman. Like a broken robot
or something. Stop with the weirdo quirks.
I tell you what, I am close to swearing off of YA. I just...can't anymore.
But
were there any good things? I guess. By the second half things started
to get better, there were some nice moments I suppose, like when the
character goes out in male drag at night to be in disguise. The love
interest is cute enough and appropriate for the protagonist. There was a
twist at the end I didn't see coming, I think maybe other people could
have guessed by I didn't til close to the end, maybe just because I
didn't care to guess either way, haha. The author did a good job at
keeping most of the scenes relevant to the overall plot and didn't
wander too much, and I would say there wasn't anything wrong with the
prose style, although it lacked any sort of flourish as well.
Basically, it's not too good and it's not too bad.
It's just there. If the first half hadn't been so boring, and I had
cared more for the characters, and if I had been more aware of what the
plot was even going to be about before I read it, instead of expecting a
book more about Egyptology, I would have liked it better. But since it
was more about an English debutante and being British and French spies
and Jane Austen I was just like...meh. If that sounds like something you
care about than go for it, but otherwise, don't bother.
No comments:
Post a Comment